Proven process
Every Tepia build runs through six phases, Discovery, Design, Development and Testing, Training, Launch and Support, with a milestone at each stage.
Read: Custom Software Development CompanyBuild or buy?
Tepia's answer for most companies is buy the core and build the edges: use off the shelf software for commodity functions like accounting and email, and build custom where your workflow is the business.
Every Tepia build runs through six phases, Discovery, Design, Development and Testing, Training, Launch and Support, with a milestone at each stage.
Read: Custom Software Development CompanyTepia scores fit, differentiation, integration, data ownership, scale economics and rate of change; 22 or more out of 30 usually justifies a build.
Read: Low Code Platforms vs Custom DevelopmentCustom systems take 4 to 10 months end to end: 1 to 3 months of Discovery, 2 to 6 months of development and QA and about a month for launch.
Read: Systems Integration ServicesTepia has spent thirteen years building software for healthcare, field service, home improvement, retail, logistics and IoT teams across the US.
Read: Build a Custom CRM or Bend Salesforce?Industry figures Tepia plans around when scoping comparison work.
McKinsey has reported that about 70% of large transformation programs fall short of their goals, usually from process mismatch.
Mobile devices generate roughly 60 percent of global website traffic, according to Statista's mobile traffic reports.
About one in four installed apps is opened a single time and then abandoned, according to Localytics retention research.
Off the shelf software wins by default for anything many companies do the same way. Tepia builds custom software and still tells prospective clients to buy these.
Tepia’s job in Discovery is to separate those situations from ordinary frustration with a tool that is merely imperfect.
Industry analysts have long observed that a large share of software implementations fail to deliver expected value, and the cause is usually mismatch between the tool and the process, not the tool’s quality. That mismatch is what the scoring framework below measures.
Score each factor from 1 (favors buying) to 5 (favors building). Tepia uses this in Discovery; a total of 22 or more out of 30 usually justifies a custom build, 14 or less means buy, and the middle band is where the hybrid approach lives.
Most Tepia clients do not replace a platform. They keep it and build the parts the platform does badly. Keep QuickBooks and build the field app that feeds it. Keep Salesforce or HubSpot and build the customer portal that reads from it. Keep Shopify and build the native shopping app on top. Keep ServiceTitan and build the dispatch logic it cannot express.
Tepia’s systems integration services and custom internal tools pages describe these builds, and the custom CRM or bend Salesforce comparison is a worked example.
The hybrid has a limit: when the bought core itself is the thing that does not fit, or when two systems disagree about which one is the source of truth. At that point Tepia recommends the full build.
Tepia’s six phase process begins with a Discovery that is designed to produce a buy recommendation when one is warranted.
A paragraph or two with information on your product/service or describes a problem your product/service is designed to solve.
CEO
Senior Project Manager
VP & Operations Manager