Comparison

Low Code Platforms vs Custom Development

Low code or custom?

The essentials at a glance

Tepia designs and builds comparison end to end, with a US based project manager on every engagement and thirteen years of delivery behind it.

dream-app

Proven process

Every Tepia build runs through six phases, Discovery, Design, Development and Testing, Training, Launch and Support, with a milestone at each stage.

Read: Custom Internal Tools for Operations Teams
connect-audience

What we build

Tepia replaces Bubble, Glide and Airtable based tools once they hit limits, keeping data in PostgreSQL and building the mobile app and integrations.

Read: Build Custom Software or Buy Off the Shelf?
smart-product

Typical timeline

Internal tools take 3 to 7 months: 3 to 6 weeks of Discovery, 2 to 4 months of development and QA and about a month for migration and launch.

Read: How to Build a Custom Internal Tool for Your Operations Team
optimize-ecommerce

Rollout

Data migration from the low code platform is rehearsed during Beta, run in parallel for a period and completed at Launch with support reps on hand.

Read: Custom Web Application Development

The numbers matter.

Industry figures Tepia plans around when scoping comparison work.

70%

Low code adoption

Gartner predicted that 70% of new applications developed by enterprises would use low code or no code technologies by 2025.

60%

Traffic from mobile

Mobile devices generate roughly 60 percent of global website traffic, according to Statista's mobile traffic reports.

20%

Revenue after mobile

Tepia clients report roughly 20% revenue increase after adding a mobile app, the surface low code platforms handle least well.

What each low code platform is good at

Low code is not one thing. Tepia has evaluated and integrated with most of the major platforms and they fit different jobs.

  • Softr and Glide turn a spreadsheet or Airtable base into a simple web or mobile web app. Excellent for a directory, a lightweight portal or a data entry tool for a small team. Limited logic, limited offline, limited scale.
  • Bubble is a full visual web app builder with its own database and workflow engine. Founders build real MVPs on it. Performance degrades with data volume, mobile is via wrappers, and the app lives on Bubble’s infrastructure.
  • Retool builds internal admin panels and dashboards on top of your existing databases and APIs.
  • Power Apps, AppSheet and similar suit companies already inside Microsoft or Google ecosystems, with per user licensing and enterprise controls.

Tepia has written about low code before and the view has not changed: these tools are the right first step for a surprising number of internal problems, and the wrong final step for any product your customers use.

The thresholds where low code stops fitting

Tepia sees the same thresholds across clients who arrive with a low code tool they have outgrown.

Two or more rows in the right hand column is Tepia’s signal to talk about custom. One row can often be handled with a hybrid approach described below.

Where Tepia still recommends low code

Tepia is a custom development studio and still points people to low code regularly. If your operations team needs a tracker for a process that ten people run, build it in Softr or Retool this week. If you are a founder testing whether anyone wants the product, a Bubble MVP is cheaper than Tepia’s Discovery phase and teaches you things a spec cannot. If you need an admin panel over a database Tepia already built for you, Retool is a fine choice and Tepia will set it up.

What Tepia adds in these cases is the architecture advice: keep your data in a real database (PostgreSQL, not the platform’s internal store) from the start, so that when you outgrow the tool the data does not have to be rescued. Tepia’s guide to building an internal tool covers the pick low code or custom step in detail.

How Tepia approaches low code vs custom decisions

Tepia applies its six phase process, with a Discovery that regularly ends in a recommendation to stay on low code for now.

  1. Deliverables: Investigation Summary with the threshold table scored for your situation, Interview Summary and User Stories. Typically 1 to 3 months, often 3 to 6 weeks for an internal tool.
  2. Design. Design questionnaire, style guide, detailed wireframes and sample designs. For internal tools Tepia designs for speed of data entry and clear status over visual polish.
  3. Development and Testing. Alpha and Beta schedules with functional, user acceptance and non functional testing, including data migration rehearsals from the low code platform and load testing at the user count you expect in three years.
  4. Training. In person and remote hands on sessions built around the user story scenarios your team runs daily.
  5. Launch. Data migration from Bubble, Airtable or Glide, a parallel run period, transition from the old tool and Tepia support reps on rollout.

The hybrid Tepia uses most: low code admin, custom everything customers touch

The most common outcome of a Tepia Discovery on this question is a hybrid. Keep Retool or a similar tool for internal admin screens where a few operations staff need tables and buttons. Have Tepia build the custom parts: the native mobile app field staff or customers use, the backend and database you own, the integrations with QuickBooks, Salesforce, HubSpot or ServiceTitan, and any logic that must be exactly right.

It also means the low code tool sits on top of your database rather than being your database, so it can be swapped later without a migration.

Related pages: custom internal tools for operations teams, build vs buy software, custom web application development. Review Tepia’s work, services and process, or contact Tepia with a description of the tool you have outgrown.

Frequently asked questions

Should we use a low code platform or hire a developer for our internal tool?
Tepia recommends low code (Softr, Glide, Retool, Bubble) for internal tools with under roughly 25 users, simple data and no customer facing surface.
When does a low code app need to be rebuilt?
Two or more of those is Tepia's signal to scope a custom build.
Can we keep our low code tool and still get custom development?
Yes, and it is the outcome Tepia recommends most often.
Will Tepia migrate our data off the low code platform?
Yes. Tepia maps the low code data model in Discovery, rehearses the migration during Beta, runs a parallel period and completes the cutover at Launch with support reps on hand. Tepia also advises clients still on low code to keep data in a real database like PostgreSQL so a later migration is simple.

What Our Customers Say.

A paragraph or two with information on your product/service or describes a problem your product/service is designed to solve.

Jascotina

CEO

“They customized the website’s backend to my business' specific needs and I am absolutely thrilled with the result.”

Water Saver Solutions

Senior Project Manager

"Tepia Co was always willing to go the extra mile for us."

Onward Engineering

VP & Operations Manager

"There are no hidden things, there are no surprises. We know what's going on."

Outgrow low code without starting over