Testing is engineering
Tepia automates where machines are better and keeps humans where judgment matters, wired into CI so nothing ships around the tests.
Read: DevOps & CI/CDTepia builds QA and automated testing: test plans, CI test gates, UAT and real device passes for iOS and Android. Useful suites in 6 to 10 weeks.
Tepia builds QA into every engagement and offers it as a service: test plans, automated unit and integration suites, functional and user acceptance testing, and real device testing for iOS and Android. The goal is releases you stop being afraid of.
Tepia automates where machines are better and keeps humans where judgment matters, wired into CI so nothing ships around the tests.
Read: DevOps & CI/CDTepia runs device passes on actual iOS and Android hardware plus beta tracks, because emulators miss what phones catch.
Read: App Maintenance and SupportSignup, payments and the endpoints everything depends on get integration tests first, making the worst regressions impossible to ship.
Read: App Development ProcessEvery fix lands with a test that proves the bug stays dead, so within a quarter the suite mirrors where your product really breaks.
Read: Custom Software DevelopmentIndustry figures Tepia plans around when scoping quality work.
Tepia clients report apps averaging 4.5 stars on the App Store and Google Play, and steady quality is most of that story.
About one in four installed apps is abandoned after a single session, per Localytics research, and crashes are a leading cause.
Defects found in development take a fraction of the effort to fix compared with production, a long standing industry finding.
Quality assurance is not a phase at the end of a project, it is the reason a release night is boring. Good QA means bugs are caught by a machine minutes after they are written, not by a customer weeks later. Tepia treats testing as engineering: automated where machines are better, human where judgment matters, and wired into the pipeline so nothing ships around it.
Tepia has run this discipline across thirteen years of client builds, on Alpha and Beta schedules with written test plans, and offers the same practice to teams whose product outgrew manual checking.
| Layer | What it checks | Who or what runs it |
|---|---|---|
| Unit tests | Individual functions and business rules | CI on every commit |
| Integration tests | APIs, database and third party services together | CI on every merge |
| Functional testing | Features against the written user stories | QA against the test plan |
| User acceptance testing | Real workflows, run by your stakeholders | Your team, guided by Tepia scenarios |
| Non functional testing | Speed under load, security basics, accessibility | Tepia tooling and review |
| Real device testing | iOS and Android behavior on actual hardware | Tepia device passes and beta tracks |
Tepia scopes each layer to your product; a two sided marketplace and an internal tool do not need identical coverage.
Most teams come to Tepia with a live product and thin tests, and the instinct is to demand full coverage. That instinct stalls. Tepia starts where failures hurt: the signup flow, payments, the five endpoints everything depends on. Those get integration tests first, wired into CI as a merge gate, so the worst regressions become impossible to ship.
Coverage then grows with every bug: each fix lands with a test that proves the bug stays dead. Within a quarter the suite reflects where your product actually breaks, which beats a coverage number every time.
Discovery reviews your codebase, recent incidents and release process, and produces a test plan tied to User Stories rather than a generic checklist. Development builds the automated layers and wires them into CI, working in your repositories. Functional and user acceptance testing follow Tepia’s standard practice: written scenarios, tracked results, and UAT run by your stakeholders with Tepia guiding.
Training hands your engineers the suite conventions so new tests follow the pattern, and Support stays on for the releases that follow. Testing pairs naturally with Tepia’s DevOps and CI/CD work, since a suite is only as useful as the gate it runs in.
The signals are familiar: releases need a full manual pass, the same bugs return, and everyone fears touching the old modules. A useful automated suite on a live product typically takes 6 to 10 weeks to establish, then grows continuously. New Tepia builds get this from day one as part of Development and Testing.
Tepia clients report apps averaging 4.5 stars on the App Store and Google Play, and steady quality is most of that story.
A paragraph or two with information on your product/service or describes a problem your product/service is designed to solve.
CEO
Senior Project Manager
VP & Operations Manager