Tenant Approval
ServiceTitan integrations need the contractor to grant API access to the app in their own tenant, and Tepia walks your admin through it.
Read: ServiceTitan Integration and Custom App DevelopmentTo integrate ServiceTitan with custom software, register an application in ServiceTitan's developer portal, have the contractor grant it access to their tenant, map the customers, locations and jobs you need, and run the sync through middleware that handles authentication, rate limits and retries. Tepia builds these integrations in Node.js or .NET on AWS or Azure for contractors who keep ServiceTitan as their system of record.
The question is rarely ServiceTitan or custom; it is which workflow belongs outside ServiceTitan and how the two stay in sync.
ServiceTitan integrations need the contractor to grant API access to the app in their own tenant, and Tepia walks your admin through it.
Read: ServiceTitan Integration and Custom App DevelopmentSyncs request only records modified since the last run, so large tenants stay within API limits and the data stays minutes fresh.
Read: Field Service Customer Portal DevelopmentTepia keeps ServiceTitan as the owner of jobs, customers and billing records, while the custom app owns only the workflow it adds.
Read: ServiceTitan alternatives: platforms vs custom field service appsEvery call Tepia's middleware makes is logged with its payload, so a failed write can be found, fixed and replayed without guesswork.
Figures Tepia plans around when extending ServiceTitan with custom software.
MuleSoft's Connectivity Benchmark Report finds most business applications still stand alone, with fewer than 30 percent integrated.
Pew Research Center reports about 90 percent of US adults own a smartphone, the reach a branded app on ServiceTitan data can use.
Tepia clients report roughly a 20 percent revenue increase after adding mobile, such as a customer app fed by ServiceTitan.
For most residential HVAC, plumbing and electrical contractors, ServiceTitan covers dispatch, the technician mobile app, estimates, memberships, payments and reporting well enough that replacing it makes little sense. The real question is usually narrower: one workflow ServiceTitan handles awkwardly, or one system it does not talk to. Tepia’s first step is naming that workflow precisely.
Common examples include a branded customer app for booking and membership details, a commercial portal where facility managers see every job across their sites, sync to an ERP such as NetSuite or Sage Intacct, a reporting warehouse that combines several brands after an acquisition, or a specialized tool for work like commissioning large equipment. Each of these can sit on top of ServiceTitan through its APIs instead of replacing it. If you are weighing a full move away, read ServiceTitan alternatives first.
Tepia builds steps four through eight as shared infrastructure, so adding a second workflow later is mostly mapping work.
Most contractors start with one of these goals. Tepia uses this table in Discovery to agree on direction and freshness for each.
| Goal | ServiceTitan data | Direction | Sync approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branded customer app | Customers, locations, appointments, memberships | Read, plus booking writes | Near real time reads, validated writes |
| Commercial client portal | Jobs, locations, technician notes, attachments | Read | Scheduled sync with per client access rules |
| ERP or accounting sync | Completed jobs, billing records, payments, inventory | Read, with status posted back | Batch after job completion, daily reconciliation |
| Cross brand reporting | Jobs, technicians, sold estimates, memberships | Read | Incremental nightly loads into PostgreSQL or a warehouse |
| Specialized technician tool | Jobs, equipment, forms | Read and write | Offline first app syncing through middleware |
| Lead intake from other channels | Customers, bookings | Write | Real time with duplicate checks |
Whichever row you start with, Tepia designs the middleware so the next row reuses the same authentication, logging and mapping code.
ServiceTitan integrations break in predictable ways, so Tepia designs for each one up front. Access tokens expire, so the middleware refreshes them automatically. API requests are rate limited, so syncs use change based queries and queues instead of reloading every job. Large tenants hold years of history, so the first backfill runs in batches outside business hours.
Credentials stay server side in AWS Secrets Manager or Azure Key Vault, never inside a mobile app, and Tepia requests only the API access the workflow needs. More on these patterns is on our ServiceTitan integration development page.
Each ServiceTitan project follows Tepia’s six phases with a US based project manager.
The usual pattern is 1 to 3 months of Discovery, 2 to 6 months of development and QA, and around a month to launch, with single workflow integrations near the short end. See our process, our field service customer portal work, or talk to Tepia about your ServiceTitan setup.
A paragraph or two with information on your product/service or describes a problem your product/service is designed to solve.
CEO
Senior Project Manager
VP & Operations Manager