Hiring in house developers vs an app development agency

When in house is the better choice, and Tepia will say so

Build in house when software is the business. If your roadmap has three years of continuous feature work, if engineers need deep daily context with your operations, or if you are raising venture capital where a technical team is part of the story, hire. Tepia has told prospects exactly this and then helped them with a scoped first version while they recruited.

Build in house when you already have a strong technical leader who can hire, manage and review code. The failure mode of an in house team is not the engineers, it is the absence of someone who can judge their work. Without that person, an agency with its own engineering leadership is safer.

Choose an agency like Tepia when the build has a defined end, when you need speed to market, when the skill mix (iOS plus Android plus backend plus design) is wider than you can hire for, or when you want to test the product before committing to permanent payroll.

Ramp time, risk and the things a salary table misses

Hiring takes time. Industry surveys consistently put time to fill a senior engineering role at two to four months, and time to full productivity at another one to three. Tepia assigns a project team within weeks and typically enters Development after a 1 to 3 month Discovery.

Attrition is the other risk. If one of three engineers leaves midway, you lose a third of your capacity and most of the knowledge of their part of the system. With Tepia, continuity is Tepia’s problem, not yours: project management and engineering leadership hold the knowledge and the code is documented as part of the process.

Finally, scope changes. An in house team absorbs scope creep invisibly; the release just slips.

How Tepia approaches hiring an app development team

Tepia’s six phase process is designed so you can compare it directly against what an in house team would produce.

Discovery (typically 1 to 3 months) includes system investigation, user interviews and a review of third party integrations. You receive an Investigation Summary, an Interview Summary and User Stories. Design produces a design questionnaire, moodboards, a style guide, detailed wireframes and sample designs. Development and Testing runs on Alpha and Beta schedules with written test plans covering functional, user acceptance and non functional testing.

Training is where the hybrid model pays off. Tepia runs in person and remote sessions walking through user story scenarios, so an in house engineer you hire later can take over a documented codebase rather than a mystery. Launch covers data migration, transition from the old system and support reps on rollout. The full detail is on the Tepia process page.

The hybrid model: Tepia builds, your team inherits

The most common outcome Tepia sees among growing companies is neither pure agency nor pure in house. Tepia builds and launches the product, the company hires one or two engineers during Beta, and Tepia’s Training phase hands the codebase over with documentation, test suites and deployment pipelines.

A Participant Media Director of IT put it this way: “If I could build an in-house team, it would be exactly like them.”

Related reading: agency vs freelancer app development, app development outsourcing, nearshore vs offshore development, and how to choose an app development company. Examples of finished products are in our work, the full offering is on the services page, and you can start a conversation at contact us.

Frequently asked questions